Independent Leon County Fire Services Separation & Disparity Report

Who pays, and who waits, when the City's fire contract ends in 2028

Max Epstein · MAXAI LLC · independent and unpaid · 15 September 2026 · all figures from public records, reproducible on request · max.epstein@gmail.com · 727-422-3389 · CC BY 4.0

Four things are here. The media brief — four pages: every headline finding with its source and its caveat, the disparity tables, what the County can do on its own, the ambulance levy, and the records nobody has seen; the leave-behind handed to the Board on 15 September. The living map — type any unincorporated Leon County address: which station answers it today, whether it is one of the 10,678, the nearest hydrant and who owns it, and what it would pay under each way of collecting the fee. Report 1 of 2, The twelve questions — what the County asked a $109,995 consultant to answer, and what the public record already answers, in the County's own order; ten can be answered, two cannot, and it says which. Report 2 of 2, Two Leon Counties — a regressive fire tax that lands nearly four times harder on the district with the least value, a fix that costs nothing, and no way to stand the same service up by October 1st, 2028; eleven findings, each opening with the fact in one sentence. Click a box to read it here, or open it in its own page.

Open the media brief (PDF, 4 pages) Open the living map — type your address Report 1 of 2 · The twelve questions Report 2 of 2 · Two Leon Counties

The media brief & executive summary — four pages, the leave-behind handed to the Board on 15 September. Open it in its own page ↗

If the document does not display above, use its button to open it directly.

What went into it

Every figure in the reports is measured, modelled, a proxy, a range or documentary, and is labelled which. The sources, and when each was pulled:

The reports were built with an AI large language model working under the author's direction; every figure is gated against a published corrections register and can be re-run by anyone. Nothing here is a County or City publication, and none of it is the County's commissioned Fitch & Associates study.

Which build is which. The two reports are the 8 September builds, stamped to corrections-register entry 00aedb11. The register has moved since (current entry 0a062d309109c691) and the media brief carries it: the wording of the 14 July vote record, one caption on the ambulance-levy timing in the walk-through, and the author's preferred way of collecting the fee — the brief argues for the 50/50 blend (half by square foot, half by value), where the reports price the square-foot tier alone as Recommendation 1. The reports will be rebuilt against the current register; until then, where the brief and a report differ, the brief is the current statement and the register says why.